Editing C&I Wiki Portal/Criteria
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | =DRAFT - WORK IN PROGRESS= | ||
'''Will go into effect 1 January 2016.'''''Italic text'' | |||
==Terminology== | ==Terminology== | ||
Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
==OCP INSPIRED Product== | ==OCP INSPIRED Product== | ||
All OCP Inspired | All OCP Inspired Products must adhere to the following criteria, which are subject to Foundation staff, Incubation Committee leadership, and relevant Project Lead. | ||
A product may called OCP INSPIRED when the following two groups of criteria are met | A product may called considered OCP INSPIRED when the following two groups of criteria are met. | ||
The Product '''MUST''' meet at least one (1) of the three (3) the following criteria: | The Product '''MUST''' meet at least one (1) of the three (3) the following criteria: | ||
'''(1)''' | '''(1)''' Product MUST fit into a 19 inch rack or Open Rack. For component-level '''MUST''' fit inside a device designed for either of those racks. | ||
'''(2)''' The spec associated with the Product '''MUST''' be submitted '''AND''' acknowledged by the following individuals: | '''(2)''' The spec associated with the Product '''MUST''' be submitted '''AND''' acknowledged by the following individuals: | ||
A Foundation Staff member | |||
The Chair or Vice Chair of the IC | |||
Relevant Project Lead(s) -- (e.g. Server Project Lead(s) for servers, Storage Project Lead(s) for Storage). | |||
'''(3)''' The Product must have one of the following licenses assigned, with proof of assignment provided to and acknowledged by the Open Compute Foundation: | '''(3)''' The Product must have one of the following licenses assigned, with proof of assignment provided to and acknowledged by the Open Compute Foundation: | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
*OCPHL-R (Open Compute Project hardware License - Reciprocal) | *OCPHL-R (Open Compute Project hardware License - Reciprocal) | ||
''' | '''AND''' | ||
The Product '''MUST''' be associated with IT computing, and/or networking, and/or storage. This association is determined | The Product '''MUST''' be associated with IT computing, and/or networking, and/or storage. This association is determined by a Foundation Staff Member or representative. | ||
'''AND''' | '''AND''' | ||
Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
All OCP Accepted products must aligned to a prior Incubation Committee approved specification (aka SPECIFICATION) that has been submitted to the Incubation Committee and been approved by vote of the Incubation Committee. | All OCP Accepted products must aligned to a prior Incubation Committee approved specification (aka SPECIFICATION) that has been submitted to the Incubation Committee and been approved by vote of the Incubation Committee. | ||
Products making the claim of compliance with an approved specification SHALL at a minimum, | Products making the claim of compliance with an approved specification SHALL provide, at a minimum, all features defined as mandatory by the use of the following keywords: SHALL - MUST - WILL - REQUIRED. Such products may also provide recommended features associated with the keyword “SHOULD” and permitted features associated with the keyword “MAY”. | ||
ALL (6) | A product may be called OCP ACCEPTED when ALL (6) criteria is met: | ||
*'''MUST''' be a product that | *'''MUST''' be a product that is being manufactured | ||
*'''MUST''' be available for purchase by any member company within | *'''MUST''' be available for purchase by any member company within xx days. . | ||
*'''MUST''' meet all criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST” or “WILL” or “REQUIRED”. | *'''MUST''' meet all criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST” or “WILL” or “REQUIRED” . NO exceptions are allowed. | ||
*The submitter has completed a self-assessment AND attests that EACH SKU (orderable part number) meets the criteria. | *The submitter has completed a self-assessment AND attests that EACH SKU (orderable part number) meets the criteria. | ||
*Submitter / Requestor has sent the self-assessment documentation to the Foundation. | *Submitter / Requestor has sent the self-assessment documentation to the Foundation. | ||
HAS provided the Foundation with the list of SKUs and Orderable P/Ns and the documentation necessary for a re-assessment to be completed by the Foundation lab director or a 3rd Party designee, and the Foundation Staff. Acceptable documentation can be links to public information or documentation sent to the foundation. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide ALL the documentation to prove the SPECIFICATION criteria is met. | |||
When a product has met the criteria to be OCP ACCEPTED: | |||
The FOUNDATION will list the SKUs and Orderable P/N’s and will publish this on the OCP web portal. | |||
The Submitter may use the term “OCP ACCEPTED” per OCP terms and conditions. | |||
If a product does NOT meet the criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST”, the submitter is encouraged to contact the original SPECIFICATION author(s) with a list of differences and non-compliance. The author(s) MAY create a modification or revision to the SPECIFICATION that would allow the submitter’s product to be reconsidered. Alternatively, the submitter may author their own specification, get it approved by the | If a product does NOT meet the criteria in the SPECIFICATION described as “SHALL” or “MUST”, the submitter is encouraged to contact the original SPECIFICATION author(s) with a list of differences and non-compliance. The author(s) MAY create a modification or revision to the SPECIFICATION that would allow the submitter’s product to be reconsidered. Alternatively, the submitter may author their own specification, get it approved by the Incubation Committee, and submit their product against it. |